User talk:Azymn/Boilerplate:Skill tree - Revision history

Leord at 14:38, 7 April 2009

2009-04-07T14:38:09Z

Leord at 14:47, 1 April 2009

2009-04-01T14:47:50Z

Azymn: Single_skill_tree

2009-03-24T06:16:46Z

Single_skill_tree

Leord at 17:34, 18 March 2009

2009-03-18T17:34:44Z

Azymn: /* Skill Navigation */

2009-03-17T05:10:51Z

‎Skill Navigation

Azymn: /* Skill Navigation */

2009-03-17T05:08:45Z

‎Skill Navigation

Leord at 12:49, 16 March 2009

2009-03-16T12:49:55Z

Vipermagi at 14:24, 14 March 2009

2009-03-14T14:24:42Z

New page

Ooh, I like those. Defo look better than the first one I made :P --[[User:Vipermagi|Vipermagi]] 15:24, 14 March 2009 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:38, 7 April 2009
Line 16:		Line 16:

	:::::Sorry for the delay in response. Yeah, that's pretty spot on! We'll make room in the "main" tree navigation to have a specific tree implemented inside it. Because of the tables etc involved, the actual detailed tree template can't have its own table headers. There are some issues with borders and cell padding that I have not been able to find where to change... --[[User:Leord\|Leord]] 16:47, 1 April 2009 (CEST)		:::::Sorry for the delay in response. Yeah, that's pretty spot on! We'll make room in the "main" tree navigation to have a specific tree implemented inside it. Because of the tables etc involved, the actual detailed tree template can't have its own table headers. There are some issues with borders and cell padding that I have not been able to find where to change... --[[User:Leord\|Leord]] 16:47, 1 April 2009 (CEST)
		+
		+	Saw your edits. I like the idea. We'll perhaps not do it exactly like that, but very good to visualise the nav box, and we'll definitely do something very similar. --[[User:Leord\|Leord]] 16:38, 7 April 2009 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:47, 1 April 2009
Line 14:		Line 14:
	::::Is [[User:Azymn/Boilerplate:Skill_tree#Single_skill_tree\|this]] what you meant by sub-templates for a single tree? If so, it is absolutely what I was thinking for the bottom half of the multi-tabbed nav at the bottom (which we touched on in ICQ). The two upper tab rows would be for the other classes and skill trees. As far as the alternative (all skills of a certain class), my most compact take on that is [[User:Azymn/Wizard_skills_(minimal)\|here]]. It's a bit tall, but it might fit alright at the bottom of a fleshed out skill article.		::::Is [[User:Azymn/Boilerplate:Skill_tree#Single_skill_tree\|this]] what you meant by sub-templates for a single tree? If so, it is absolutely what I was thinking for the bottom half of the multi-tabbed nav at the bottom (which we touched on in ICQ). The two upper tab rows would be for the other classes and skill trees. As far as the alternative (all skills of a certain class), my most compact take on that is [[User:Azymn/Wizard_skills_(minimal)\|here]]. It's a bit tall, but it might fit alright at the bottom of a fleshed out skill article.
	::::--[[User:Azymn\|Azymn]] 07:16, 24 March 2009 (CET)		::::--[[User:Azymn\|Azymn]] 07:16, 24 March 2009 (CET)
		+
		+	:::::Sorry for the delay in response. Yeah, that's pretty spot on! We'll make room in the "main" tree navigation to have a specific tree implemented inside it. Because of the tables etc involved, the actual detailed tree template can't have its own table headers. There are some issues with borders and cell padding that I have not been able to find where to change... --[[User:Leord\|Leord]] 16:47, 1 April 2009 (CEST)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ==Skill Navigation==
 Ooh, I like those. Defo look better than the first one I made :P --[[User:Vipermagi|Vipermagi]] 15:24, 14 March 2009 (CET)
-<br/><br/>
+<br/>
 :I made a few more examples. I like my third one the most. It's compact, and includes all info. The main thing to note is that I'd like ALL nav boxes to retain 80% width! Besides that, what do the rest of you guys think? --[[User:Leord|Leord]] 13:49, 16 March 2009 (CET)
-<br/><br/>
+<br/>
 ::Thanks for the feedback guys.  80% width is fine with me, the only issue we may face is how long certain skill tree names will be with the Pirate, Ninja, and Unicorntaur classes coming in the expansion.  But we can handle that when the time comes, so I took Leord's 3rd suggestion and pared it down for our current needs.  Anything else we want to tinker with at this point?  --[[User:Azymn|Azymn]]
-<br/><br/>
+<br/>
 :::I am happy. No need to tinker more. I also think that they won't use uber-long class names or skill tree names, so I think we can go with this. Lets use this on all skills and skill trees.
@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 :::Alternatively... It could be all the skills of a certain class, if that does not look cluttered. --[[User:Leord|Leord]] 18:34, 18 March 2009 (CET)

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 Ooh, I like those. Defo look better than the first one I made :P --[[User:Vipermagi|Vipermagi]] 15:24, 14 March 2009 (CET)
 <br/><br/>
-I made a few more examples. I like my third one the most. It's compact, and includes all info. The main thing to note is that I'd like ALL nav boxes to retain 80% width! Besides that, what do the rest of you guys think? --[[User:Leord|Leord]] 13:49, 16 March 2009 (CET)
+:I made a few more examples. I like my third one the most. It's compact, and includes all info. The main thing to note is that I'd like ALL nav boxes to retain 80% width! Besides that, what do the rest of you guys think? --[[User:Leord|Leord]] 13:49, 16 March 2009 (CET)
 <br/><br/>
-Thanks for the feedback guys.  80% width is fine with me, the only issue we may face is how long certain skill tree names will be with the Pirate, Ninja, and Unicorntaur classes coming in the expansion.  But we can handle that when the time comes, so I took Leord's 3rd suggestion and pared it down for our current needs.  Anything else we want to tinker with at this point?  --[[User:Azymn|Azymn]]
+::Thanks for the feedback guys.  80% width is fine with me, the only issue we may face is how long certain skill tree names will be with the Pirate, Ninja, and Unicorntaur classes coming in the expansion.  But we can handle that when the time comes, so I took Leord's 3rd suggestion and pared it down for our current needs.  Anything else we want to tinker with at this point?  --[[User:Azymn|Azymn]]
 <br/><br/>

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ==Skill Navigation==
 Ooh, I like those. Defo look better than the first one I made :P --[[User:Vipermagi|Vipermagi]] 15:24, 14 March 2009 (CET)
+<br/><br/>
 I made a few more examples. I like my third one the most. It's compact, and includes all info. The main thing to note is that I'd like ALL nav boxes to retain 80% width! Besides that, what do the rest of you guys think? --[[User:Leord|Leord]] 13:49, 16 March 2009 (CET)
+<br/><br/>
 Thanks for the feedback guys.  80% width is fine with me, the only issue we may face is how long certain skill tree names will be with the Pirate, Ninja, and Unicorntaur classes coming in the expansion.  But we can handle that when the time comes, so I took Leord's 3rd suggestion and pared it down for our current needs.  Anything else we want to tinker with at this point?  --[[User:Azymn|Azymn]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:08, 17 March 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:

	I made a few more examples. I like my third one the most. It's compact, and includes all info. The main thing to note is that I'd like ALL nav boxes to retain 80% width! Besides that, what do the rest of you guys think? --[[User:Leord\|Leord]] 13:49, 16 March 2009 (CET)		I made a few more examples. I like my third one the most. It's compact, and includes all info. The main thing to note is that I'd like ALL nav boxes to retain 80% width! Besides that, what do the rest of you guys think? --[[User:Leord\|Leord]] 13:49, 16 March 2009 (CET)
		+
		+	Thanks for the feedback guys. 80% width is fine with me, the only issue we may face is how long certain skill tree names will be with the Pirate, Ninja, and Unicorntaur classes coming in the expansion. But we can handle that when the time comes, so I took Leord's 3rd suggestion and pared it down for our current needs. Anything else we want to tinker with at this point? --[[User:Azymn\|Azymn]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:49, 16 March 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	==Skill Navigation==
	Ooh, I like those. Defo look better than the first one I made :P --[[User:Vipermagi\|Vipermagi]] 15:24, 14 March 2009 (CET)		Ooh, I like those. Defo look better than the first one I made :P --[[User:Vipermagi\|Vipermagi]] 15:24, 14 March 2009 (CET)
		+
		+	I made a few more examples. I like my third one the most. It's compact, and includes all info. The main thing to note is that I'd like ALL nav boxes to retain 80% width! Besides that, what do the rest of you guys think? --[[User:Leord\|Leord]] 13:49, 16 March 2009 (CET)