Difference between revisions of "User talk:Leord/Skill template"

ADVERTISEMENT
From Diablo Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Azymn)
Line 7: Line 7:
  
 
::As for table/div: You'll please choose for me what would be most flexible in the long run. If we do add skins, we could just make the Skill box (and other boxes) into specific classes that can be fixed from the CSS. --[[User:Leord|Leord]] 18:28, 9 April 2009 (CEST)
 
::As for table/div: You'll please choose for me what would be most flexible in the long run. If we do add skins, we could just make the Skill box (and other boxes) into specific classes that can be fixed from the CSS. --[[User:Leord|Leord]] 18:28, 9 April 2009 (CEST)
 +
 +
:::Skins:
 +
:::[http://www.diablowiki.net/Special:Preferences?title=Main_Page&useskin=standard Classic],
 +
:::[http://www.diablowiki.net/Special:Preferences?title=Main_Page&useskin=simple Simple],
 +
:::[http://www.diablowiki.net/Special:Preferences?title=Main_Page&useskin=nostalgia Nostalgia],
 +
:::[http://www.diablowiki.net/Special:Preferences?title=Main_Page&useskin=myskin MySkin],
 +
:::MonoBook (default),
 +
:::[http://www.diablowiki.net/Special:Preferences?title=Main_Page&useskin=monobook2 MonoBook2],
 +
:::[http://www.diablowiki.net/Special:Preferences?title=Main_Page&useskin=cologneblue Cologne Blue],
 +
:::[http://www.diablowiki.net/Special:Preferences?title=Main_Page&useskin=chick Chick],
 +
:::[http://www.diablowiki.net/Special:Preferences?title=Main_Page&useskin=monobook-arsed MonoBook-arsed]
 +
:::Only default Monobook doesn't look like shit, and Arsed is broken. Otoh, Monobook's the only skin with a limited width, which is annoying me to no end really, but that's besides the point. </ramble> --[[User:Vipermagi|Vipermagi]] 20:43, 9 April 2009 (CEST)

Revision as of 18:43, 9 April 2009

Azymn

Thanks a bunch for the help! Yes, I missed this edit. This is how I thought of it as well. Perhaps we can use the parser to make several different versions, basically. As for the actual table. Take a look at the nav bars, it needs to not have any border besides the one line, imho. What do you think? --Leord 13:13, 9 April 2009 (CEST)

No prob. The problem I see with specifying border colors is that people who have an alternate skin selected might get a weird mixed experience...unless you don't allow alternate skin selection or if all the skins have the same color palette (I didn't check). That's the advantage of using wiki elements like tables - it handles all the style information based on the skin. Let me know if you want to hardcode it anyhow. We can certainly go table-less.
--Azymn 17:08, 9 April 2009 (CEST)
If the table works fine in terms of using them everywhere, then I have no problems with them at all, and I do lack some skill in handling div tags myself. I'm pretty sure there is only one skin, and no real plans to make additional ones though. We'll go with the same styling of the box as the tables though. They are currently manually styled, so if there is a new skin with other colours added, we'll have to re-make them all anyway.
As for table/div: You'll please choose for me what would be most flexible in the long run. If we do add skins, we could just make the Skill box (and other boxes) into specific classes that can be fixed from the CSS. --Leord 18:28, 9 April 2009 (CEST)
Skins:
Classic,
Simple,
Nostalgia,
MySkin,
MonoBook (default),
MonoBook2,
Cologne Blue,
Chick,
MonoBook-arsed
Only default Monobook doesn't look like shit, and Arsed is broken. Otoh, Monobook's the only skin with a limited width, which is annoying me to no end really, but that's besides the point. </ramble> --Vipermagi 20:43, 9 April 2009 (CEST)