Difference between revisions of "User talk:Melianor"
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
: Hehe, not I was just being silly. Some friendly competition can be good, but it's mostly an air of cooperation that's important. Well, I take it as a great compliment that you don't have anything to complain about the Wiki (yet). --[[User:Leord|Leord]] 20:07, 24 October 2008 (CEST) | : Hehe, not I was just being silly. Some friendly competition can be good, but it's mostly an air of cooperation that's important. Well, I take it as a great compliment that you don't have anything to complain about the Wiki (yet). --[[User:Leord|Leord]] 20:07, 24 October 2008 (CEST) | ||
− | + | ||
+ | ==[[Attribute]]s== | ||
+ | Oh, and dude! Great job on the stats! I have been meaning to make them for ages. It's so nice to be able to link those words in articles now without spreading too much red words! I made redirects for [[Strength]], [[Dexterity]], [[Vitality]] and [[Willpower]] as well, so you can just use any of those, and they will link to your [[Attribute]] article. Remind you, I'll be moving "[[Attributes]]" to "[[Attribute]]" further down the line, just so you know. Singular > Plural, since you can make links like these: "<nowiki>[[Attribute]]s</nowiki>" and they turn out like this: [[Attribute]]s. It makes thinsg a lot easier with the linking. --[[User:Leord|Leord]] 12:44, 27 October 2008 (CET) | ||
+ | : Also, added a message on [[Talk:Attributes|that page]]. Easier for others to comment there =) --[[User:Leord|Leord]] 12:51, 27 October 2008 (CET) |
Revision as of 11:51, 27 October 2008
Contribs
Hey dude! You got some seriously cool additions here, I'm very impressed! =) Fallen for the Wizard indeed? I think I have too ;) --Leord 14:13, 23 October 2008 (CEST)
- Fallen indeed. I think you can count me in as a major Wizard contributor. I try to contribute in fields that overlap a bit, when i see new content tidbits rising up :) Your contributions certainly surpass mine though. Good to see the wiki sprouting! --Melianor 20:11, 23 October 2008 (CEST)
- Well, the contribs aren't a competition (unless you want it to be ;))! I appreciate small and big ones equally, as it's usually mostly a matter of how much time people have on their hands, not what they are capable ow willing to do. If I got put in a time capsule where I wouldn't age, I could finish this wiki, and come out with a done product. Problem is just to find such a device ;) I'm also copy-pasting this from the PM I sent you, in case anyone's interested in our little wiki-discussion:
- Also, do you feel the wiki markup is logical enough, and if you get enough support from the help pages? Any info you feel is missing?
- I also apologise for the "reply-on-talk-page" comment. I didn't realize you did reply here ;)
- --Leord 10:39, 24 October 2008 (CEST)
I didn't mean to make this sound like a competition. A wiki lives and dies with all who contribute. Wiki markup in my view has always been easy to use. There is not soo much you can format, but what you can do is way enough and simple. I would not change anything, neither in the help section. Those special navboxes are something that can be done by a few and then copied by many ;)
I guess i will keep mostly in the Wizard section and some of the related sections. Also when i have time i update tidbits i find through the news.
I hope this will become a thriving wiki with lots of useful information! :D --Melianor 17:29, 24 October 2008 (CEST)
- Hehe, not I was just being silly. Some friendly competition can be good, but it's mostly an air of cooperation that's important. Well, I take it as a great compliment that you don't have anything to complain about the Wiki (yet). --Leord 20:07, 24 October 2008 (CEST)
Attributes
Oh, and dude! Great job on the stats! I have been meaning to make them for ages. It's so nice to be able to link those words in articles now without spreading too much red words! I made redirects for Strength, Dexterity, Vitality and Willpower as well, so you can just use any of those, and they will link to your Attribute article. Remind you, I'll be moving "Attributes" to "Attribute" further down the line, just so you know. Singular > Plural, since you can make links like these: "[[Attribute]]s" and they turn out like this: Attributes. It makes thinsg a lot easier with the linking. --Leord 12:44, 27 October 2008 (CET)